Identify what type of performance management/appraisal method is represented in the following sample. What does the research/journal literature say about this type of performance management/appraisal method? Is it effective? How does it compare to other methods? Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite all of the references that you use in APA format in-text and on a reference page. This assignment should be double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, with 1-inch margins.
Sample Task Rating Dimension for a Patrol Officer:
Task: Preparing for Duty
7
Always early for work, gathers all necessary equipment to go to work, fully dressed, uses time before roll call to review previous shift’s activities and any new bulletins, takes notes of previous shift’s activity mentioned during roll call.
6
Always early for work, gathers all necessary equipment to go to work, fully dressed, checks activity from previous shifts before going to roll call.
5
Early for work, has all necessary equipment to go to work, fully dressed.
4
On time, has all necessary equipment to go to work, fully dressed.
3
Not fully dressed for roll call, does not have all necessary equipment.
2
Late for roll call majority of period, does not check equipment or vehicle for damage or needed repairs, unable to go to work from roll call, has to go to locker, vehicle, or home to get necessary equipment.
1
Late for roll call majority of period, does not check equipment or vehicle, does not have necessary equipment to go to work.
* Rater should circle the number of the description that best explains the behavior of the patrol officer being evaluated.
Assignment Grading Rubric
Far Exceeds Standards
Exceeds Standards
Meets Standards
Fails to Meet Standards
Accuracy of the Response
Did you answer the main question correctly? What is the plausibility of your response?
Score:
Provided the most accurate answer to the question posed, supported with a strong and convincing discussion.
(5)
Provided an answer that was possible and this answer was supported via a strong and convincing discussion.
(4)
Provided an answer that was highly unlikely, but did make a strong argument via the discussion.
(3)
Provided a response that was inaccurate and did not present a strong argument for support.
(0-2)
Depth and Quality of the Response
I will consider how detailed your discussion is, how far into depth you go, and whether you make a rational argument.
Score:
Thoroughly discusses the HRM issue at hand, providing convincing and supported arguments.
(9-10)
Discusses the HRM issue at hand, providing supported arguments, but could have gone into a bit more depth.
(8)
Discusses the HRM issue at hand, providing supported arguments, but could have gone into much more depth.
(7)
Fails to discuss the HRM issue at hand, does not provide convincing or supported arguments, and lacks any significant degree of depth.
(0-6)
Literature Review of the HR Issue—Reference Support
The more reference support you use, the better. The quality of the journals is also important.
Score:
Empirical research from multiple journal articles provided strong support for the discussion. Several of the journal articles used came from top-tier journals.
(9-10)
Empirical research from journal articles provided support for most of the discussion. More references could have been used and more could have come from top-tier journals.
(8)
Several parts of the discussion lacked strong support from the empirical research presented in journal articles. Most of the articles came from lower-level journals.
(7)
Fails to support the knowledge associated with issue at hand. The few articles that were used came from low-level journals or websites.
(0-6)
Total Score:
___ out of 25
