Sheet1
MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC
SNO Criteria Weight Score Excellent Good Fair Below Proficient
1 Content of Review 40% In depth analysis of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with a high degree of clarity and insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, both indicate the overall focus of the paper Points : 40 Comprehensive analysis of the content (most of the major points discussed). Adequate summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with considerable clarity, but lacks insight. Engaging introduction and conclusion, paper focus inconsistently supported. Points : 34 Minimal analysis of the content (some of the major points discussed). Basic summary. Communicates the key ideas/themes/findings with little clarity or insight. Introduction and conclusion do not indicate the overall focus of the paper. Points : 28 No content (missed all major points of the content). Incomplete summary. Key ideas/themes/findings are not communicated clearly and/or missed in analysis. There is no clear introduction or conclusion Points : 24
2 Reflection 30% Demonstrates thorough understanding of the article by listing all key findings and reflecting upon their implications. Points : 30 Demonstrates considerable understanding of the article by listing all of the key findings. Points : 25 Demonstrates some understanding of the article by listing some of the key findings…but documentation is lacking in completeness. Points : 21 Demonstrates little understanding of the article with few or no key findings reported. Points: 18
3 Organization & Development of Ideas 15% Logical development of ideas through welldeveloped paragraphs, good use of transitions. Points : 15 Logical organization, paragraph development not perfected. Points : 12 Logical organization, paragraphs not fully developed. Points : 10 No evidence of structure or organization. Points: 08
4 Mechanics 15% Meets length requirement. 1-2 grammatical errors. 1-2 punctuation errors. Ace homework tutors – APA 7 Guidelines are meticulously followed. Adheres to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 15 Length requirement is met with adequate content 3-4 grammatical errors. 3-4 punctuation errors. Adheres consistently to Ace homework tutors – APA 7 guidelines, however, one error present. Adheres to either Font or Spacing Guidelines, but not both. Points : 12 Length requirement is not met; minimal content 5-6 grammatical errors 5-6 punctuation errors Demonstrates little ability to adhere to Ace homework tutors – APA 7 guidelines, more than two errors present Adheres to neither Font nor Spacing Guidelines Points : 10 Length requirement is not met; poor content Numerous grammatical errors (distracting) Numerous punctuation errors Ace homework tutors – APA 7 format is not used Does not adhere to Font/Spacing Guidelines. Points : 08
TOTAL 100%
——
MSITM 6320 AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT – RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW RUBRIC Sheet1
SNO Criteria
Weight Score Excellent Good Fair Fairly Below Proficient
1 Review Content
forty percent
In-depth examination of the content (all major points discussed). Excellent synopsis. Communicates key ideas/themes/findings with exceptional clarity and insight. Both the introduction and conclusion are engaging, and they both indicate the overall focus of the paper. 40 points A thorough examination of the content (most of the major points discussed). A good summary. The key ideas/themes/findings are communicated with considerable clarity, but there is a lack of insight. While the introduction and conclusion are engaging, the paper’s focus is inconsistently supported. 34 points The content has been subjected to only a cursory examination (some of the major points discussed). A brief summary. With little clarity or insight, communicates the key ideas/themes/findings. The introduction and conclusion do not represent the overall
