The anthropology of violence is the study of violence from an anthropological perspective, which involves examining the cultural, social, and historical factors that shape and are shaped by violence. This includes studying the various forms of violence that exist in different societies, the ways in which violence is understood and justified, and the impact that violence has on individuals and communities.
Some topics that may be explored in the anthropology of violence include:
Types of violence: There are many different types of violence, including physical violence, sexual violence, structural violence, and symbolic violence. The anthropology of violence looks at the various forms of violence that exist in different societies and how they are understood and justified.
The cultural and social context of violence: The cultural and social context in which violence occurs can shape its causes, forms, and consequences. The anthropology of violence examines the ways in which culture and social norms influence violence and how violence, in turn, can shape culture and social norms.
The impact of violence: Violence can have significant consequences for individuals and communities, including physical and psychological harm, social disruption, and economic loss. The anthropology of violence looks at the ways in which violence affects people and communities and the strategies that they use to cope with and prevent violence.
The role of power and inequality: Violence is often rooted in power imbalances and inequalities, and is used as a means of maintaining or challenging these power dynamics. The anthropology of violence examines the ways in which violence is used to assert or resist power and how it is shaped by power and inequality.
The anthropology of violence is a complex and multifaceted field that seeks to understand the cultural, social, and historical factors that shape and are shaped by violence, and the ways in which violence affects individuals and communities.
Answer the following 5 questions, based from the documentary, Standard Operating Procedure,using the movie as your source. 1. What specific events or conditions do the different speaks identify as contributing to a culture of OTA or impunity? 2. How are the people (guards/inmates) affected by the conditions the narrators in the film describe? Do other locations in the us share the problems they describe? 3. The narrators discuss why violence was justified during certain moments. What were those moments? 4. What do the narrators suggest would resolve the problem of OTA and impunity? 5. Does the military have their own, separate ‘culture’? Describe what you mean by culture, and show how they constitute, or not, a culture.
