Question description
MUST BE ORIGINAL AND PASS TURNITIN.Case Study 3: Risk Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment on a Satellite Development
Project
Read the attached case titled: “Risk Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment on a Satellite Development
Project”.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which
you:
Suggest
the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan.
Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for
the project to be successful.
Justify
the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it
took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager, recommend
the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical
path identified.
Assess
how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project.
Imagine
the team working on the satellite development project was a virtual team
in which team members were unable to meet in person. Explain the expected
impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team could maintain
its current goal in both planning and execution.
Use
at least five (5) quality
academic (peer-reviewed) resources in this assignment.
Your assignment must:
Be
typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch
margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or
school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
instructions.
Include
a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name,
the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and
the reference page are not included in the required assignment page
length.
The specific course learning outcomes
associated with this assignment are:
Estimate
project costs and associated risks associated with each cost.
Use
technology and information resources to research issues in managing human
resource projects.
Write
clearly and concisely about managing human resource projects using proper
writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on
answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing
skills, using the following rubric.
Case
Study 3: Risk Get research paper samples and course-specific study resources under homework for you course hero writing service – Manage ment on a Satellite Development Project
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below
70% F
Fair
70-79%
C
Proficient
80-89%
B
Exemplary
90-100%
A
1.
Suggest the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand
for the project to be successful.
Weight:
10%
Did
not submit or incompletely suggested the issues that could have developed had
the team not had a risk plan. Did not submit or incompletely determined the
major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be
successful.
Partially
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Partially determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to
understand for the project to be successful.
Satisfactorily
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Satisfactorily determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs
to understand for the project to be successful.
Thoroughly
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Thoroughly determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to
understand for the project to be successful.
2.
Justify the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager,
recommend the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the
critical path identified.
Weight: 20%
Did
not submit or incompletely justified the value of a risk plan considering the
time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Did not
submit or incompletely recommended the approach that you would take to ensure
the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project
manager.
Partially
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Partially recommended the approach
that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified,
if you were the project manager.
Satisfactorily
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Satisfactorily recommended the
approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path
identified, if you were the project manager.
Thoroughly
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Thoroughly recommended the approach
that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified,
if you were the project manager.
3.
Assess how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.
Weight:
25%
Did
not submit or incompletely assessed how to determine the level of risk
management appropriate for a project.
Partially
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.
Satisfactorily
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.
Thoroughly
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.
4.
Explain the expected impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team
could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.
Weight:
30%
Did
not submit or incompletely explained the expected impact on the project, and
suggested two(2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both
planning and execution.
Partially
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.
Satisfactorily
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.
Thoroughly
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.
5.
Five (5) References
Weight:
5%
No
references provided.
Does
not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor
quality choices.
Meets
number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Exceeds
number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6.
Clarity and writing mechanics
Weight:
10%
More
than 6 errors present
5-6
errors present
3-4
errors present
0-2
errors present
