Memo 5: due March 7: Why are immigration coalitions (“pro” and “anti”) so unstable and so
difficult to assemble? How does this factor promote stasis in immigration policy making?
—————————————————————————————————————–
Sources
———————-
March 7 & 9: Topic 8: U.S. Immigration Policy: A new selection regime, 1945-
David FitzGerald and David Cook-Martin, Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of
Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Chapter
3, 109-140
Tichenor, Daniel J. “The politics of immigration reform in the United States, 1981-1990.” Polity
(1994): 333-362.; “The Political Dynamics of Unauthorized Immigration: Conflict,
Change, and Agency in Time.” Polity 47.3 (2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service): 283-301. (available via UCLA library:
JSTOR)
Reimers, “Explaining,” 8-18
Lee, “A nation…”, 14-17
Memo#5
In this report memo, it seeks to evaluate the nature of immigration policies in the society. The immigration coalitions are usually so unstable and difficult to form due to the diverse parties in the formation of the immigration coalitions. One of the main reasons for the instability of the immigration coalition is the politicization of the immigration policies. It is always recommendable that the governments should work together in promoting stability of the immigration policies.
Geopolitical instability also leads to unstable immigration coalitions (Czaika and Hein De 489). For example, the EU member states are deeply divided on the immigration policies. Germany supports the immigration policy of allowing the refugees into their country. However, the Germany leaders have been facing a backlash on their open-door immigration policy. Thus, concerns about the stability of the global security and geopolitical environment make it difficult to form comprehensive immigration coalitions and policies.
The difficulty of forming immigration coalitions is the main factor that leads to stasis I the immigration policy making. It is because the stakeholders involved the immigration policy making feels that they will be unable to work well in creating a universally acceptable immigration policy (Haas, Katharina and Simona 78). The challenging of creating stable immigration coalitions limits the negotiation of better terms in the immigration policy (Cook-Martín and David 45). Immigration policy making process depends on the ability of the countries involved to work together to develop better immigration policies.
Domestic political factors and aspects of nations involved in an immigration coalitions could limit the success of the immigration policy making process. It is because some of the national leaders could support stricter immigration policies, which makes it difficult to each with the coalition partners (Tichenor 334). It is commendable that the immigration policies are formed of like-minded political leaders and partners who are ready to offset their domestic regulations and laws for universal immigration collation policy.
Works Best paper writer websites, Custom term paper writing service and Research papers owl essays – Professional help in research projects for students – Cite d
Cook-Martín, David, and David, FitzGerald. “Symposium David FitzGerald’s and David Cook-Martín’s Culling the Masses: The Democratic Origins of Racist Immigration Policy in the Americas.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38.8 (2015 – Research Paper Writing Help Service).
Czaika, Mathias, and Hein De Haas. “The effectiveness of immigration policies.” Population and Development Review 39.3 (2013): 487-508.
Haas, Hein, Katharina Natter, and Simona Vezzoli. “Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies.” International Migration Review (2016: 2024 – Do my homework – Help write my assignment online).
Tichenor, Daniel J. “The politics of immigration reform in the United States, 1981-1990.” Polity 26.3 (1994): 333-362.
