BUS30009: Industry Consulting Project
Page 1 of 2
Final Report
Marking and Feedback Sheet
Project name: Facilitator:
Team Name:
Student Names
Item Exemplary (HD) Very Good (D) Competent (C) Developing (P) Unsatisfactory (N) Grade &
Comments
Executive Summary
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 1)- 5%
The summary clearly
identifies key
recommendations
and succinctly covers
the organizational
implications and risks
(if any).
The summary identifies
key recommendations
and issues needing
further consideration.
The summary lists most
of the key
recommendations
and associated
implementation issues.
The summary
excludes some key
recommendations,
and does not fully
capture the flavor of
the report.
The summary does not
accurately reflect the
report’s contents and
ignores to mention key
recommendations.
Background, Purpose
and Scope
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 2)- 5%
Project background,
purpose and scope
are comprehensively
summarized.
Addition/revision of
scope (if applicable)
has been justified.
Project background,
purpose and scope
are clearly
summarized.
Addition/revision of
scope (if applicable)
has been explained.
Project background,
purpose and scope
are listed.
Addition/revision of
scope (if applicable) is
listed.
Project background,
purpose and scope
have been
inadequately listed
and explained.
Important details
about background,
purpose and scope
are completely
ignored.
Implications from the
External Analysis
(Distribution of Marks:
serial #3)- 10%
Excellent summary of
the significant external
factors and discussion
of their implications
Clear summary of the
significant external
factors and discussion
of their implications.
Reasonable summary
of the main external
factors with discussion
of their implications.
Some key external
factors are missing
and discussions are
inadequate.
Key external factors
are not presented and
discussed.
Swinburne University of Technology
BUS30009: Industry Consulting Project
Page 2 of 2
Recommendations
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 4) – 50%
All the
recommendations are
comprehensively
explained, wellconsidered,
and are
underpinned by an indepth
analysis.
Most of the
recommendations are
comprehensively
explained, wellconsidered,
and are
underpinned by an indepth
analysis.
Major
recommendations are
well explained and
well analyzed.
Some
recommendations
have not been well
explained and
analyzed.
Recommendations
are not entirely
logical and have
not been
adequately
analyzed.
Implementation
Issues
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 5) – 15%
All the organizational
implications and
resource requirements
have been identified
and discussed.
A majority of the
organizational and
resource implications
have been identified
and discussed.
Key organizational
and resource
implications have
been identified and
discussed.
Some of the major
organizational and
resource
implications have
not been identified
Implementation
issues have been
ignored.
Conclusion
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 6) – 5%
A succinct summary
that highlights the key
takeaways is
provided.
A clear summary and
identification of key
takeaways are
included.
Reasonable summary
and identification of
main takeaways is
included
A summary is
provided with key
takeaways is
included
Poor summary
without the
identification of key
takeaways.
Logical structure,
readability, and
professional
presentation
(Distribution of Marks:
serial # 7)- 10%
The analysis is logically
structured, easy to
understand, well
referenced, and does
not contain any
grammatical errors.
The analysis is well
structured,
unambiguous, with
good references and
has few grammatical
errors.
The analysis has a
good structure, is
generally
unambiguous, and
does not have major
grammatical errors.
The analysis has an
implicit structure,
requires some
reading between
the lines, and needs
editing for
grammatical errors.
The analysis has an
illogical structure, is
difficult to
understand, and is
replete with
grammatical errors.
Overall Grade

Published by

Ace Tutors

View all posts